Back to Bills
SENATE-JOINT-RESOLUTION 113119th Congress

S.J.Res.113 - A joint resolution providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to "Rescission of Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions".

Introduced: March 5, 2026
Status: Introduced
R.for.R

AI-Powered Summary

Generated by AI Analysis

SENATE-JOINT-RESOLUTION 113 aims to disapprove a rule related to climate-related financial risk management, thereby impacting how financial institutions consider environmental risks in their operations. The major themes addressed include the intersection of climate change and financial regulation, as well as the balance of power between Congress and executive agencies. Key provisions involve the legislative rejection of the existing rule, which may lead to reduced accountability for financial institutions regarding their environmental impact. The resolution does not specify implementation requirements or a timeline, as it primarily serves as a disapproval measure. Potential impacts include increased financial instability for individuals due to the lack of climate risk considerations by financial institutions, as well as implications for constitutional rights related to a healthy environment and economic security, raising concerns about the separation of powers and regulatory authority.

Demographic Impact Analysis

AI Demographics Analysis

Summary

Overall Constitutional Implications

The resolution poses significant risks to individual rights, particularly for those in economically vulnerable positions. By nullifying climate-related financial risk management, it may lead to increased economic instability and reduced access to financial services for affected communities.

Key Individual Rights Affected

  • Right to Economic Opportunity
  • Equal Protection under the Law
  • Implied Right to a Healthy Environment

Constitutional Provisions

  • 14th Amendment - Equal Protection Clause
  • Implied rights related to economic security and environmental health

Potential Constitutional Challenges

The resolution could face challenges based on its disparate impact on marginalized communities, potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause. Additionally, the lack of regulatory oversight may infringe on individuals' rights to economic security.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution 113 has profound implications for individual rights, particularly concerning economic stability and equal protection. The potential for disparate impacts on various demographic groups raises significant constitutional concerns, particularly for low-income and marginalized communities that may face greater economic instability and health risks due to climate change.

Constitutional Analysis

R.for.R

This bill has been analyzed for constitutional compliance using AI-powered analysis of constitutional principles and precedents.

Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.

Take Action

Text 50409

💡 How to use:

These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention S.J.Res. 113 to reference this bill.

Contact Your Representatives

Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill

Rate This Bill

Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.

Sign In Free

Timeline

March 5, 2026

Bill Introduced

Current

Introduced

May 5, 2026

Last Updated

Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill

Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.

Sign In Free to Chat