Back to Bills
HOUSE-RESOLUTION 932119th Congress

HOUSE-RESOLUTION 932: H.Res.932 - Denouncing dangerous and seditious rhetoric by Members of Congress and expressing condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representative Jason Crow, Representative Christopher Deluzio, Representative Maggie Goodlander, and Representative Chrissy Houlahan for attempting to sow disallegiance amongst members of the United States military and intelligence community and encouraging them to act against the Commander in Chief and President of the United States and violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Introduced: December 4, 2025
Status: Referred to Committee
R.for.R

AI-Powered Summary

Generated by AI Analysis

HOUSE-RESOLUTION 932 aims to address and condemn the rhetoric of specific Members of Congress that is perceived as undermining military loyalty and national security. The resolution emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong chain of command within the military and upholding the President's authority as Commander in Chief, which is rooted in constitutional principles. Major themes include the protection of national security, the integrity of military orders, and the implications of free speech under the First Amendment. Key provisions highlight the resolution's denouncement of what it terms 'dangerous and seditious rhetoric,' asserting that such statements could jeopardize military personnel safety and national security. The resolution also raises concerns about the potential suppression of dissenting voices in Congress, which could infringe upon legislative critique of the executive branch. Implementation of the resolution does not specify a timeline but suggests a need for accountability regarding the public statements of the Members of Congress named. The potential impacts include a chilling effect on political discourse and the possibility of stifling legitimate debate regarding military actions and government authority.

Demographic Impact Analysis

AI Demographics Analysis

Summary

Overall Constitutional Implications

The resolution's implications for individual rights are profound, particularly for military personnel who may feel pressured to suppress dissenting opinions regarding orders they perceive as unlawful. This could lead to a culture of silence that undermines the principles of free speech and due process.

Key Individual Rights Affected

  • First Amendment rights to free speech
  • Due process rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice

Constitutional Provisions

  • First Amendment
  • Article II, Section 2
  • Fifth Amendment (due process)

Potential Constitutional Challenges

The resolution may face challenges related to the chilling effect on free speech, particularly if military personnel are disciplined for expressing concerns about orders. Additionally, the potential for retaliation against dissenting voices could be scrutinized under constitutional protections.

Summary

While HOUSE RESOLUTION 932 aims to reinforce military discipline and the authority of the Commander in Chief, it raises significant constitutional concerns regarding the rights of military personnel to express dissent and question the legality of orders. The implications for individual rights, particularly in terms of free speech and due process, warrant careful consideration and could lead to legal challenges.

Constitutional Analysis

R.for.R

This bill has been analyzed for constitutional compliance using AI-powered analysis of constitutional principles and precedents.

Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.

Take Action

Text 50409

💡 How to use:

These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention H.Res. 932 to reference this bill.

Contact Your Representatives

Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill

Rate This Bill

Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.

Sign In Free

Policy Topics

Timeline

December 4, 2025

Bill Introduced

Current

Referred to Committee

June 12, 2026

Last Updated

Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill

Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.

Sign In Free to Chat