Back to Bills
HOUSE-RESOLUTION 374119th Congress

HOUSE-RESOLUTION 374: H.Res.374 - Recognizing the disenfranchisement of District of Columbia residents, calling for statehood for the District of Columbia through the enactment of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, and expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2025, as "D.C. Statehood Day".

Introduced: May 1, 2025
Status: Introduced
supported

AI-Powered Summary

Generated by AI Analysis

HOUSE-RESOLUTION 374 aims to address the disenfranchisement of District of Columbia residents by advocating for their right to voting representation in Congress and local self-government. The major themes include individual rights to participate in democracy, the historical struggle for representation, and the push for statehood through the Washington, D.C. Admission Act. Key provisions emphasize the lack of voting representation for D.C. residents despite their significant federal tax contributions, and the resolution highlights that 86% of D.C. residents support statehood. Implementation requirements involve legislative action to enact the proposed statehood measures, with an emphasis on the need for Congress to reconsider its authority over the federal district. The potential impacts include increased political representation for D.C. residents and a shift in congressional dynamics. The existing legal context implicates constitutional provisions such as Amendment XXIII, which allows D.C. residents to participate in the electoral college, and Article IV, Section 3, which grants Congress the authority to admit new states. The resolution conflicts with house-resolution 1244 and overlaps with it, while also amending house-resolution 871.

Detailed Analysis

Section 1

Summary
Individual Implications

The resolution addresses the disenfranchisement of District of Columbia residents, advocating for their right to voting representation in Congress and local self-government, which directly impacts individual rights to participate in democracy.

Constitutional Rights

The resolution implicates the 23rd Amendment, which allows D.C. residents to participate in the electoral college, and the Admissions Clause, which grants Congress the authority to admit new states. It also touches on the District Clause, which provides Congress with plenary authority over the federal district.

Constitutional Concerns

There may be concerns regarding the constitutionality of admitting D.C. as a state, particularly in relation to the size and location of the federal district as established by the District Clause. Additionally, the resolution's call for statehood may conflict with existing interpretations of congressional authority over the federal district.

Key Points
  • D.C. residents lack voting representation in Congress despite paying significant federal taxes.
  • The resolution supports the enactment of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act to grant statehood to D.C.
  • A significant majority (86%) of D.C. residents have expressed support for statehood.
  • The resolution emphasizes the historical struggle of D.C. residents for representation and self-governance.
Existing Legal Context
Implicated Constitutional Provisions
  • Amendment XXIII
  • Article IV, Section 3
Conflicting Bills
  • house-resolution 1244
Overlapping Bills
  • house-resolution 1244
Amended Bills
  • house-resolution 871

Constitutional Analysis

supported

This bill appears to align with constitutional principles. The proposed legislation operates within the established framework of constitutional authority and does not appear to conflict with fundamental rights or the separation of powers.

Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.

Legal Framework

The legal framework behind this bill — the statutes it references, the constitutional provisions it implicates, and other bills it relates to.

Related Constitutional Provisions

Amendment XXIIIArticle IV, Section 3

Related Legislation

90% confidence

H.Res.871 also calls for statehood for the District of Columbia.

Conflicts withHOUSE-RESOLUTION 1244
80% confidence

H.Res.1244 supports a different date for 'D.C. Statehood Day'.

90% confidence

Near-duplicate title

Take Action

Text 50409

💡 How to use:

These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention H.Res. 374 to reference this bill.

Contact Your Representatives

Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill

Rate This Bill

Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.

Sign In Free

Policy Topics

Timeline

May 1, 2025

Bill Introduced

Current

Introduced

June 18, 2026

Last Updated

Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill

Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.

Sign In Free to Chat