HOUSE-RESOLUTION 161: H.Res.161 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 20) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions’’; and providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.

Individual Implications

The resolution facilitates congressional disapproval of regulations that may impact energy conservation and environmental standards, which can affect individual rights related to health, safety, and environmental quality. Individuals may experience changes in energy costs and environmental protections as a result of these disapprovals.

Constitutional Rights

The actions taken under this resolution may implicate Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants legislative powers to Congress. This section may also affect individuals' rights to a healthy environment and access to energy-efficient resources.

Constitutional Concerns

There may be concerns regarding the balance of power between federal regulatory agencies and Congress, as well as the potential for undermining environmental protections that could affect public health and welfare. The disapproval of regulations could lead to increased emissions and energy costs for individuals.

Key Points

• The resolution allows for the disapproval of specific Department of Energy and EPA rules, which could lead to less stringent energy conservation and environmental standards.
• The waiver of points of order against the resolutions suggests a streamlined process that may limit debate and scrutiny, potentially impacting individual rights to participate in the legislative process.
• The concurrent resolution on the budget may indirectly affect funding for programs that support energy efficiency and environmental protection, impacting individuals' access to these resources.

Existing Legal Context