Back to Bills
HOUSE-JOINT-RESOLUTION 174119th Congress

HOUSE-JOINT-RESOLUTION 174: H.J.Res.174 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide for term limits for justices of the Supreme Court.

Introduced: May 4, 2026
Status: Introduced
R.for.R

AI-Powered Summary

Generated by AI Analysis

HOUSE-JOINT-RESOLUTION 174 aims to introduce term limits for Supreme Court justices, significantly altering the judicial landscape and potentially impacting individual rights by changing the composition and decisions of the Court over time. The major themes addressed include judicial accountability, the separation of powers, and the independence of the judiciary. Key provisions propose a structured limit on the tenure of justices, which proponents argue enhances democratic accountability, while opponents express concerns about undermining judicial independence and the risk of politicization. Implementation requirements are not explicitly detailed in the bill, but would likely involve legislative processes to establish the term limits and transition for current justices. The potential impacts include a more dynamic Supreme Court that may better reflect public sentiment, but also raises concerns about the stability of legal precedents that protect individual rights. The existing legal context implicates Amendment XXVII, which relates to the compensation of Congress members and indirectly to judicial appointments, and this resolution amends house-joint-resolution 145, which may have similar implications for judicial terms.

Detailed Analysis

Section 1

Summary
Individuals
Impact

The proposed amendment introduces term limits for Supreme Court justices, which could affect the judicial landscape and the rights of individuals by potentially altering the composition and decisions of the Court over time.

Constitutional Rights
Affected

The amendment may impact the separation of powers doctrine and the independence of the judiciary, which are essential for protecting individual rights under the Constitution.

Constitutional Concerns
Support

Proponents may argue that term limits enhance democratic accountability and prevent justices from serving indefinitely, which could be seen as a positive reform for individual rights.

Concerns

Opponents may argue that imposing term limits undermines judicial independence and could lead to politicization of the Court, potentially jeopardizing the protection of individual rights.

Key Points
Relevant To Individual Impact

The amendment could lead to a more dynamic and potentially more representative Supreme Court, but it also raises concerns about the stability and continuity of legal precedents that protect individual rights.

Existing Legal Context
Constitutional Provisions Implicated

Amendment XXVII, which addresses the compensation of members of Congress and indirectly relates to the stability of judicial appointments.

Related Bills

This amendment amends house-joint-resolution 145, which may have similar implications for judicial appointments or terms.

Constitutional Analysis

R.for.R

This bill has been analyzed for constitutional compliance using AI-powered analysis of constitutional principles and precedents.

Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.

Legal Framework

The legal framework behind this bill — the statutes it references, the constitutional provisions it implicates, and other bills it relates to.

Related Constitutional Provisions

Amendment XXVII

Related Legislation

90% confidence

Proposing an amendment to limit the terms of office of the judges of the Supreme Court

Take Action

Text 50409

💡 How to use:

These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention H.J.Res. 174 to reference this bill.

Contact Your Representatives

Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill

Rate This Bill

Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.

Sign In Free

Policy Topics

Timeline

May 4, 2026

Bill Introduced

Current

Introduced

June 18, 2026

Last Updated

Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill

Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.

Sign In Free to Chat