HOUSE-BILL 938: H.R.938 - No Contracts with Foreign Adversaries Act
AI-Powered Summary
HOUSE-BILL 938 aims to regulate contracts between institutions of higher education and foreign entities, primarily to safeguard national security by limiting foreign influence in educational settings. The bill addresses major themes of national security, academic freedom, and the potential impact on educational resources and opportunities for students. Key provisions include a prohibition on contracts with defined 'foreign entities of concern' and 'foreign countries of concern', which may restrict institutions from engaging in beneficial international collaborations. Implementation requirements involve obtaining waivers for certain contracts, which could introduce bureaucratic hurdles and delay beneficial partnerships. The potential impacts include limitations on educational diversity, increased scrutiny of academic institutions, and a chilling effect on innovation and academic freedom, raising constitutional concerns regarding free speech and due process rights.
Demographic Impact Analysis
Summary
Overall Constitutional Implications
HOUSE-BILL 938 raises significant constitutional concerns, particularly regarding the rights of individuals associated with educational institutions. The restrictions on contracts with foreign entities could limit educational opportunities and infringe upon the rights of students, faculty, and staff to engage in free speech and academic inquiry.
Key Individual Rights Affected
- First Amendment rights related to academic freedom and free speech
- Equal Protection rights under the 14th Amendment
- Due Process rights concerning the waiver process and enforcement mechanisms
Constitutional Provisions Most Relevant
- First Amendment
- 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
- 5th Amendment (Due Process Clause)
Potential Constitutional Challenges Or Support
Challenges
- The bill may face legal challenges based on its chilling effect on academic freedom and potential discriminatory impacts on individuals from specific countries.
- The lack of clarity in the waiver process could lead to arbitrary enforcement, raising due process concerns.
Support
- Proponents may argue that the bill serves a legitimate interest in national security, which could be framed as a valid exercise of governmental power.
Summary Of Individual Impact
The bill's restrictions could significantly limit the availability of international programs and research funding, disproportionately affecting students and faculty from diverse backgrounds. The potential for discrimination based on nationality or ethnicity raises equal protection issues, while the chilling effect on academic freedom poses a direct threat to First Amendment rights. Overall, the bill's implications necessitate careful scrutiny to ensure compliance with constitutional protections.
Constitutional Analysis
This bill has been analyzed for constitutional compliance using AI-powered analysis of constitutional principles and precedents.
Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.
Take Action
Text 50409
💡 How to use:
These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention H.R. 938 to reference this bill.
Contact Your Representatives
Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill
Rate This Bill
Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.
Sign In FreeTimeline
February 4, 2025
Bill Introduced
Current
Referred to Committee
June 12, 2026
Last Updated
Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill
Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.
Sign In Free to Chat