Back to Bills
HOUSE-BILL 8113119th Congress

HOUSE-BILL 8113: H.R.8113 - To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a feasibility study on a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam, and for other purposes.

Introduced: March 26, 2026
Status: Referred to Committee
R.for.R

AI-Powered Summary

Generated by AI Analysis

HOUSE-BILL 8113 aims to address critical issues surrounding water resources and environmental management, particularly focusing on the Colorado River system. The bill seeks to optimize hydropower generation while preventing the spread of invasive species, which are significant concerns for local ecosystems and economies. Major themes include the balance between federal oversight and state rights, particularly regarding property and water access, as well as the implications for environmental rights. Key provisions involve a feasibility study that assesses the management of water resources, with funding that is non-reimbursable, raising questions about fiscal responsibility for taxpayers. Implementation requirements include a structured approach to stakeholder engagement and public input, ensuring that local communities have a voice in the decision-making process. The potential impacts of the bill could significantly affect local livelihoods, recreational use of water resources, and the overall health of the environment, while also raising constitutional concerns about federal control over state resources.

Demographic Impact Analysis

AI Demographics Analysis

Summary

Overall Constitutional Implications

The bill's focus on a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam has broader implications for individual rights, particularly regarding access to essential resources. While it aims to optimize environmental management, the potential for unequal impacts on various demographic groups raises serious constitutional concerns.

Key Individual Rights Affected

  • Right to water and resources
  • Equal protection under the law

Constitutional Provisions

  • 14th Amendment - Equal Protection Clause
  • Implied rights to essential resources

Potential Constitutional Challenges

  • Disparate impact on low-income and minority communities could lead to legal challenges under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • Lack of public participation mechanisms may undermine transparency and accountability, potentially leading to further legal scrutiny.

Summary

While HOUSE-BILL 8113 primarily addresses technical aspects of water management, its implications for individual rights, particularly regarding equitable access to water and energy resources, are significant. The potential for disparate impacts on vulnerable demographic groups raises constitutional concerns that must be addressed to ensure compliance with equal protection principles.

Constitutional Analysis

R.for.R

This bill has been analyzed for constitutional compliance using AI-powered analysis of constitutional principles and precedents.

Analysis generated using AI-powered review of constitutional principles and legal precedents.

Take Action

Text 50409

💡 How to use:

These links will start a conversation with ResistBot. When prompted, mention H.R. 8113 to reference this bill.

Contact Your Representatives

Write to YOUR elected officials about this bill

Rate This Bill

Sign in to save a private rating for this bill and track your civic engagement over time.

Sign In Free

Timeline

March 26, 2026

Bill Introduced

Current

Referred to Committee

June 12, 2026

Last Updated

Ask the Constitutional AI About This Bill

Sign in free to chat with our constitutional analysis AI about this bill — get plain-English explanations, constitutional concerns, and demographic impact estimates personalized to you.

Sign In Free to Chat